Metastable resistance training

Metastable resistance training has been studied in 1 paper since 2025: 1 trial in people. The newest paper, Oct 15, 2025: “Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial”.

Intervention

1 paper studies it4 findingsUpdated

See all 1

“A significant time-by-group interaction was observed for inhibitory control when contrasting MRT with BT, t(80) = 3.56, p < 0.001, β = 0.42, 95% CI [0.19, 0.65]”
Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trialBMC geriatrics2025doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06438-y

None of its findings points the other way.

  • 1 lab in 1 country
  • Funder: Universität Kassel
  • Human trial1

Studies in people

1 study gave metastable resistance training to people and measured what changed.

What did studies of Metastable resistance training find?

2

Studies of Metastable resistance training measured 2 outcomes; the most studied are perceptual processing (1 study) and inhibitory control (1).

Perceptual processing

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Metastable resistance training improves perceptual processing in humans.

    “A significant time-by-group interaction was observed when comparing MRT and BT for both RT, t(79) = 2.35, p = 0.020, β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.03, 0.35], and ACC, t(79) = −2.69, p = 0.009, β = −0.26, 95% CI [−0.45, −0.07], suggesting larger improvements in response behavior for MRT.”

    Human trialcompared with balance training10 weeksn = 82

    Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    BMC geriatrics

  2. Metastable resistance training improves perceptual processing in humans (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.03, 0.35], p = 0.020).

    “perceptual processing was significantly enhanced when comparing MRT with BT for both reaction time, t(79) = 2.35, p = 0.020, β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.03, 0.35]”

    Human trialcompared to BTtwice a week10 weeksn = 83

    Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    BMC geriatrics

Inhibitory control

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Metastable resistance training improves inhibitory control in humans.

    “The time-by-group interaction was significant when comparing MRT with BT, t(80) = 3.56, p < 0.001, β = 0.42, 95% CI [0.19, 0.65], indicating significantly greater improvements in inhibitory control following MRT.”

    Human trialcompared with balance training10 weeksn = 83

    Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    BMC geriatrics

  2. Metastable resistance training improves inhibitory control in humans (β = 0.42, 95% CI [0.19, 0.65], p < 0.001).

    “A significant time-by-group interaction was observed for inhibitory control when contrasting MRT with BT, t(80) = 3.56, p < 0.001, β = 0.42, 95% CI [0.19, 0.65]”

    Human trialcompared to BTtwice a week10 weeksn = 83

    Effects of metastable resistance training with strength and balance requirements compared to traditional resistance and balance training on cognitive performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    BMC geriatrics

Latest