Intramedullary nail

Intramedullary nail has been studied in 8 papers since 2017: 1 trial and 6 observational studies in people, 1 review; 1 in the past year. The newest paper, Oct 14, 2026: “Treatment and outcome of proximal femur fractures in a resource limited setting: a prospective observational study in rural Tanzania”.

Intervention

8 papers study it12 findingsUpdated

1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 8

“There was a significantly improved regain of mobility for those treated with the intramedullary nail.”
Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stabilityInjury2017doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.029

1 of its findings points the other way.

  • 6 independent labs in 5 countries
  • 1 finding against
  • Human trial1
  • Humans6

Studies in people

1 study gave intramedullary nail to people and measured what changed.

  • up: Improves regain of mobility

    no change: Has no effect on mortality

    no change: Has no effect on fracture healing complications

    Randomized trial1,000 peopleBothMean age 82 yearsUp to one year from injury

    Older adults; Trochanteric hip fracture

    Injury, Oct 20, 2017

What did studies of Intramedullary nail find?

9

Studies of Intramedullary nail measured 9 outcomes; the most studied are mortality (4 studies), discharge to domicile by day-30 (1) and early mobilization (1).

Mortality

no changein humans3downin humans1

4 studies
  1. Intramedullary nail has no effect on mortality in humans (1.00, 95% CI [0.96, 1.03]).

    “no statistically significant differences in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (MD = -2.50, 95% CI [-6.46, 1.45], Z = 1.24, P = 0.22), the Barthel Index (MD = 2.66, 95% CI [-7.60, 12.92], T = 1,12, df = 2, P = 0.38), the generic quality of life (MD = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.17], Z = 0.70, P = 0.49), the health-related quality of life (MD = -0.14, 95% CI [-3.57, 3.28], Z = 0.08, P = 0.93) or mortality (1.00, 95% CI [0.96, 1.03], Z = 0.16, P = 0.87) outcomes”

    Reviewintertrochanteric hip fracture

    Comparing Intramedullary Nails versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation

  2. Intramedullary nail has no effect on mortality in humans.

    “Adjusted relative mortality risk for IMN was 1.12 [0.96; 1.31] at 30-days, 1.03 [0.91; 1.17] at 90-days, and 1.01 [0.92; 1.11] at 1 year.”

    Humanstrochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31-A)30 daysn = 9,547

    Mortality in patients with trochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31-A) treated with sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail: A retrospective national registry study of 9547 patients from the Danish Fracture Database

    Injury

  3. Intramedullary nail decreases mortality in humans (HRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p = 0.007).

    “Lower one-year mortality was found for IMN compared with SHS for stable fractures (HRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96; p = 0.007)”

    Humansstable fractures, 1 year postoperatively

    Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

    The bone & joint journal

  4. Intramedullary nail has no effect on mortality in humans.

    “No statistically significant differences between the two types of fixation methods was observed for mortality, fracture healing complications”

    Human trialTrochanteric hip fracture; compared with sliding hip screwUp to one year from injury77% femalesn = 1,000

    Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability

    Injury

Discharge to domicile by DAY-30

downin humans1OR 0.77

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail decreases discharge to domicile by day-30 in humans (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, p < 0.001).

    “and lower likelihood of discharge to domicile by day-30 post-admission (OR 0.77, 95 %CI 0.71-0.84; p < 0.001) compared to SHS.”

    Humanship fracture

    Sliding hip screw constructs are associated with early mobilisation, return to domicile and shorter length of stay when compared to an intramedullary nail: Results from the Scottish hip fracture audit

    Injury

Early mobilization

downin humans1OR 0.64

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail impairs early mobilization in humans (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.70, p < 0.001).

    “There was however a significantly lower early mobilisation rate with IMN (OR 0.64, 95 %CI 0.59-0.70; p < 0.001)”

    Humanship fracture

    Sliding hip screw constructs are associated with early mobilisation, return to domicile and shorter length of stay when compared to an intramedullary nail: Results from the Scottish hip fracture audit

    Injury

Physical function

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail improves physical function in humans (MD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.34, 1.54]).

    “Harris hip score (MD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.34, 1.54], T = 3.54, df = 9, P = 0.006) favoring the nails”

    Reviewintertrochanteric hip fracture

    Comparing Intramedullary Nails versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation

Length of stay

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail decreases length of stay in humans (1 day shorter).

    “LOS was 1 day shorter for the IM nail group as a whole.”

    Humanstrochanteric hip fracturesn = 46,121

    Trochanteric hip fractures treated surgically-outcome in a ten-year cohort of 46,121 patients from the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry

    OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma

Postoperative mortality

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail has no effect on postoperative mortality in humans.

    “no clinically significant differences in 7-day, 30-day, 90-day, or 1-year postoperative mortality were observed”

    Humanstrochanteric hip fractures1-yearn = 46,121

    Trochanteric hip fractures treated surgically-outcome in a ten-year cohort of 46,121 patients from the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry

    OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma

Reoperation

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail decreases reoperation in humans (HRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.97, p = 0.022).

    “Reoperation rate was lower after surgery with IMN for unstable fractures one year (HRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.97; p = 0.022)”

    Humansunstable fractures, 1 year postoperatively

    Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

    The bone & joint journal

Fracture healing complications

no changein humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail has no effect on fracture healing complications in humans.

    “No statistically significant differences between the two types of fixation methods was observed for mortality, fracture healing complications”

    Human trialTrochanteric hip fracture; compared with sliding hip screwUp to one year from injury77% femalesn = 1,000

    Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability

    Injury

Regain of mobility

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Intramedullary nail improves regain of mobility in humans.

    “There was a significantly improved regain of mobility for those treated with the intramedullary nail.”

    Human trialTrochanteric hip fracture; compared with sliding hip screwUp to one year from injury77% femalesn = 1,000

    Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability

    Injury

Latest

Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 11 paper in 12 months