Implicit learning
Implicit learning has been studied in 1 paper since 2024: 1 trial in people. The newest paper, Aug 7, 2024: “Implicit learning provides advantage over explicit learning for gait-cognitive dual-task interference”.
1 paper studies it2 findingsUpdated
“With regard to the difference in training effects between the two groups, this result indicated that the improvement in LDS under DT conditions was greater in the IL group than in the EL group.”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 1 lab in 1 country
- Human trial1
Studies in people
1 study gave implicit learning to people and measured what changed.
up: Improves dual task interference
Randomized trial30 people60 to 80 years
Healthy community-dwelling older individuals
Scientific reports, Aug 7, 2024
What did studies of Implicit learning find?
2Studies of Implicit learning measured 2 outcomes; the most studied are dual task interference (1 study) and gait performance (1).
Dual task interference
upin humans1
1 study
Dual task interference
upin humans1
Implicit learning improves dual task interference in humans (dual-task condition).
“The results of standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation of mediolateral (ML) distance, cognitive task performance (number of correct answers), DTC of LDS (DTCLDS) and DTC of the cognitive task performance (DTCCog) in DT condition respectively, showed that the within-subjects factor was significant; however, neither their between-subjects factor nor the interaction effect was significant”
Human trialdual-task conditionn = 30
Scientific reports
Gait performance
upin humans1
1 study
Gait performance
upin humans1
Implicit learning improves gait performance in humans under dual-task conditions.
“With regard to the difference in training effects between the two groups, this result indicated that the improvement in LDS under DT conditions was greater in the IL group than in the EL group.”
Human trialunder dual-task conditionsn = 30
Scientific reports