Computer-aided quality feedback and monitoring system

1 paper3 findings

C, W, M, H: cells, worms or flies, mice, humans. Dark: independent labs found the same change there. Light: one lab or one study. Outline: nothing yet.

Labs are independent when their papers share no last author and no institution.

Against: findings that point the other way from most findings on the same outcome.

On aging: the drug’s trials ARN judged to be about aging, of every trial that tests it for any use.

No results posted: trials that ended more than a year ago with no results on ClinicalTrials.gov and no paper in ARN’s record.

Company ties: findings with an author at a company, or from a paper whose competing-interests statement declares ties to one.

1 lab in 1 country

Funders: Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond and others

Human trial1

Outcomes

Adenocarcinoma

upin humans1OR 1.51

1 study

Computer-aided quality feedback and monitoring system increases adenocarcinoma in humans (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15).
“ACDR (8·9% vs 6·5%; 1·51, 1·06-2·15; p=0·027)”
Human trialpatients with positive fecal immunochemical test undergoing colonoscopyCopenhagen Colonoscopy Concept (CCC)
Effect of a computer-aided quality feedback system on colonoscopists' adenoma detection rate in Denmark: a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, controlled trial
The Lancet. Digital health2 Sep 2026

Latest

1 in 12 months

The Lancet Digital Health3 Sep

Effect of a computer-aided quality feedback system on colonoscopists' adenoma detection rate in Denmark: a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Randomised trial in peopleAdenoma

Paper

Computer-aided quality feedback and monitoring system

Outcomes

Latest

Effect of a computer-aided quality feedback system on colonoscopists' adenoma detection rate in Denmark: a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Related