Standard and extended high-frequency pure-tone averages

There is 1 paper on standard and extended high-frequency pure-tone averages in aging research: 1 observational study in people. The newest story, Nov 11, 2026: “Study proposes reference data for very high-frequency hearing”.

Biomarker

1 paper studies it1 finding

1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 1 papers on standard and extended high-frequency pure-tone averages

“Men had worse hearing than women when analyzed using a four-frequency PTA for both the standard and EHF ranges.”
Reference Data Set of Extended High-Frequency Audiometry in Young, Middle, and Older PopulationsJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026doi:10.1044/2026_jslhr-26-00256
  • Humans1

Associations

1

Male sex

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Male sex is associated with standard and extended high-frequency pure-tone averages in humans (men compared with women).

    “Men had worse hearing than women when analyzed using a four-frequency PTA for both the standard and EHF ranges.”

    Humansmen compared with womenn = 717

    Study proposes reference data for very high-frequency hearing

    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR

Latest

Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 0Nov 2026: 11 paper in 12 months
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Study proposes reference data for very high-frequency hearing

Among adults with normal standard-range hearing, average very high-frequency thresholds ranged from −12.5 to 97.5 decibels of hearing level.Among adults with normal standard-range hearing, average very high-frequency thresholds ranged from −12.5 to 97.5 decibels of hearing level.

Cross-sectional · 717 peopleBiomarkers