Mean semantic noise

1. Conversational interaction decreases mean semantic noise in humans (baseline 2.09 ± 0.34 to M6 1.81 ± 0.47, p = 0.009).

   “In the MCI group, baseline MSN was significantly higher than M6 MSN (paired t-test: p = 0.009)”

   Human trialin participants with mild cognitive impairment6 months

   Changes in Conversational Pattern as a Clinical Trial Outcome Using the I-CONECT Data

   GSA 2025 abstract·31 Dec 2025

2. Conversational interaction decreases mean semantic noise in humans (baseline: 2.09 ± 0.34 vs M6: 1.81 ± 0.47, p = 0.009).

   “In the MCI group, baseline MSN was significantly higher than M6 MSN ( p = 0.009)”

   Human trialin MCI group6 months

   Changes in conversational pattern as a clinical trial outcome using the I‐CONECT data

   AAIC 2025 abstract·25 Dec 2025

More on Conversational interaction

1. Mild cognitive impairment is associated with mean semantic noise in humans (MCI: 2.09 ± 0.34 vs NC: 1.87 ± 0.35, p = 0.024).

   “the MCI group’s MSN was significantly higher than the NC group’s (MCI: 2.09 ± 0.34, NC: 1.87 ± 0.35; p = 0.024) at baseline”

   Human trialat baseline

   Changes in Conversational Pattern as a Clinical Trial Outcome Using the I-CONECT Data

   GSA 2025 abstract·31 Dec 2025

2. Mild cognitive impairment is associated with mean semantic noise in humans (MCI: 2.09 ± 0.34 vs NC: 1.87 ± 0.35, p = 0.024).

   “At baseline, the MCI group's MSN was significantly higher than the NC group's (MCI: 2.09 ± 0.34, NC: 1.87 ± 0.35; p = 0.024).”

   Human trialat baseline

   Changes in conversational pattern as a clinical trial outcome using the I‐CONECT data

   AAIC 2025 abstract·25 Dec 2025

More on Mild cognitive impairment