Dr. Noon CAC score

There is 1 paper on Dr. Noon CAC score in aging research: 1 observational study in people. The newest story, Nov 7, 2026: “Adjusted eye-image model stayed accurate in Korean cohort”.

Biomarker

1 paper studies it3 findings

1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 1 papers on Dr. Noon CAC score

“discrimination was preserved in the Korean cohort (AUC 0.819 and 0.840 for CACS≥100 and ≥300) but lower in the European cohort (0.731 and 0.707)”
Recalibrating a Retinal-Based Coronary Artery Calcium Probability Model to Actionable Thresholds: Multinational External ValidationAHA Scientific Sessions 2026 abstract2026doi:10.1161/circ.154.suppl_1.16411
  • Humans1

Effects

2

Clinical net benefit

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Dr. Noon CAC score is linked with better clinical net benefit in humans (Independent Korean cohort) (Positive net benefit across threshold probabilities 0.05–0.49 for CACS≥100 and 0.01–0.30 for CACS≥300).

    “DCA showed positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.05-0.49 (CACS≥100) and 0.01-0.30 (CACS≥300) in the Korean cohort”

    HumansIndependent Korean cohortn = 12,299

    Adjusted eye-image model stayed accurate in Korean cohort

    AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 abstract

Overall calibration

upin humans1

1 study
  1. Dr. Noon CAC score is linked with better overall calibration in humans (Independent Korean cohort after recalibration).

    “After recalibration, CITL was restored at every threshold in the Korean cohort.”

    HumansIndependent Korean cohort after recalibrationn = 12,299

    Adjusted eye-image model stayed accurate in Korean cohort

    AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 abstract

Associations

1

Discrimination of coronary artery calcium thresholds

mixedin humans1

1 study
  1. Dr. Noon CAC score predicts discrimination of coronary artery calcium thresholds in humans (External validation in Korean and European cohorts) (AUC 0.819 and 0.840 in Korea versus 0.731 and 0.707 in Europe for CACS≥100 and ≥300, respectively).

    “discrimination was preserved in the Korean cohort (AUC 0.819 and 0.840 for CACS≥100 and ≥300) but lower in the European cohort (0.731 and 0.707)”

    HumansExternal validation in Korean and European cohorts

    Adjusted eye-image model stayed accurate in Korean cohort

    AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 abstract

Latest

Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 0Nov 2026: 11 paper in 12 months
AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 Abstract

Adjusted eye-image model stayed accurate in Korean cohort

In 12,299 Korean screening participants, the authors reported that adjusted probabilities matched observed artery-calcium frequencies to approximately within one…In 12,299 Korean screening participants, the authors reported that adjusted probabilities matched observed artery-calcium frequencies to approximately within one percentage point.

Cohort · 12,299 peopleBiomarkers