Phase 2/3Not yet recruiting

A Study Comparing the MAGICTouch™ Sirolimus-coated Balloon With a Paclitaxel-coated Balloon for Treating Severe Narrowing or Blockage in the Femoropopliteal Arteries. (MAGICAL SFA)

MAGICTouchTM PTA Sirolimus-Coated BALloon vs Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for Treatment of High-grade Stenotic or Occluded Lesions in Femoro-Popliteal Arteries

Sponsor
Concept Medical Inc. (Industry)
Enrolment
478 planned
Conditions
Popliteal Artery Disease; Superficial Femoral Artery Disease
Interventions
Sirolimus (RAPAMUNE) drug-coated balloon angioplasty catheter; Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty
Ages
adults, older adults
Registry
NCT07359807

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

From the registry

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries. The long-term success of bare balloon PTA in the femoropopliteal segment is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which can be reduced by local antiproliferative drug delivery via the PTA balloon catheter. The rationale of this trial is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the MagicTouch drug-coated balloon (DCB) is at least equal (non-inferior) with regard to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (PTX DCB). The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center trial is to compare the Magic Touch® DCB with PTX DCBs for treatment of high-grade stenotic or occluded lesions in supeficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or P1 segment of the popliteal artery in PAD patients.

Primary outcomes

  • Vessel Patency Rate & Freedom from Post-Procedure Complications after One Year (12 months)

History

  1. Study completion expected

  2. Primary completion expected

  3. Last registry update

  4. Started

  5. Registered