Cumulative unfavorable social determinants of health

Cumulative unfavorable social determinants of health has been studied in 1 paper since 2026: 1 observational study in people; 1 in the past year. The newest story, Oct 31, 2026: “Social disadvantage linked to poorer thinking skills in Black men”.

Exposure

1 paper studies it1 findingUpdated

1 new paper in 30 daysSee all 1

“Greater unfavorable SDoH scores were associated with lower memory”
Cumulative Unfavorable Social Determinants of Health and AT(N)‐V Pathology in Relation to Cognitive Performance Among Non‐Hispanic Black Men from HABS‐HDAlzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging2026doi:10.1002/bsa3.70119
  • 1 lab
  • Funders: National Institute on Aging and 1 more
  • Humans1

What is Cumulative unfavorable social determinants of health linked with?

1

Studies link Cumulative unfavorable social determinants of health with 1 measure, most often memory (1 study).

Memory

downin humans1

1 study
  1. Cumulative unfavorable social determinants of health is associated with memory in humans (Non-Hispanic Black men) (Memory β = −0.23, p < 0.001; executive function β = −0.24; processing speed β = −0.19; language β = −0.15; all p < 0.001).

    “Greater unfavorable SDoH scores were associated with lower memory”

    HumansNon-Hispanic Black menmalesn = 331

    Social disadvantage linked to poorer thinking skills in Black men

    Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging

Latest

Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 0Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 11 paper in 12 months
Alzheimer's & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging

Social disadvantage linked to poorer thinking skills in Black men

Greater disadvantage was linked to lower memory scores in 331 non-Hispanic Black men; the coefficient, which measures the statistical link, was minus 0.23.Greater disadvantage was linked to lower memory scores in 331 non-Hispanic Black men; the coefficient, which measures the statistical link, was minus 0.23.

Cross-sectional · 331 peoplePopulations