Cognitive impairment without dementia
Cognitive impairment without dementia has been studied in 1 paper since 2018: 1 observational study in people. The newest paper, Nov 23, 2018: “Assessing Risk for Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults: The Need to Include Both Physical Frailty and Cognition”.
1 paper studies it3 findingsUpdated
See all 1 papers on cognitive impairment without dementia
At a glance
The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 1 lab in 1 country.
“only CIND = 26%, sub-hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-1.8”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 1 lab in 1 country
- Funders: National Institute on Aging and 3 more
- Humans1
What did studies of cognitive impairment without dementia find?
1Studies of cognitive impairment without dementia measured one outcome, Risk identification for ADL dependence.
Risk identification for ADL dependence
upin humans1
1 study
Risk identification for ADL dependence
upin humans1
Cognitive impairment without dementia is linked with better risk identification for ADL dependence in humans (added to a model that already included physical frailty) (Harrell's C 0.74 vs 0.71).
“increased accuracy in identifying those at higher risk of ADL dependence (Harrell's concordance [C], 0.74 vs 0.71; P < .001)”
Humansadded to a model that already included physical frailty8 years
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
What is cognitive impairment without dementia linked with?
2Studies link cognitive impairment without dementia with 2 measures: death and ADL dependence.
Death
upin humans1HR 1.6
1 study
Death
upin humans1HR 1.6
Cognitive impairment without dementia is linked with a higher risk of death in humans (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.9; 41% vs 21% reference).
“only CIND = 41%, HR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4-1.9”
Humanscompared with no deficit, adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, depression and smoking8 years
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
ADL dependence
upin humans1
1 study
ADL dependence
upin humans1
Cognitive impairment without dementia is linked with a higher risk of ADL dependence in humans (sHR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8; 26% vs 14% reference).
“only CIND = 26%, sub-hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-1.8”
Humanscompared with no deficit, adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, depression and smoking, death as competing risk8 years
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society