Artificial intelligence assistance

1 paper4 findings

C, W, M, H: cells, worms or flies, mice, humans. Dark: independent labs found the same change there. Light: one lab or one study. Outline: nothing yet.

Labs are independent when their papers share no last author and no institution.

Against: findings that point the other way from most findings on the same outcome.

No results posted: trials that ended more than a year ago with no results on ClinicalTrials.gov and no paper in ARN’s record.

Company ties: findings with an author at a company, or from a paper whose competing-interests statement declares ties to one.

1 lab in 1 country
1 finding against

Humans1

Outcomes

Abnormal interpretation rate

no changein humans1upin humans1

1 study

Artificial intelligence assistance has no effect on abnormal interpretation rate in humans (9.5% vs 8.4%).
Humansscreening mammography
Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study
European radiology13 Aug 2026
Artificial intelligence assistance increases abnormal interpretation rate in humans (18.7% vs 12.1%).
Humansdiagnostic mammography
Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study
European radiology13 Aug 2026

Reading time

no changein humans1

1 study

Artificial intelligence assistance has no effect on reading time in humans (65.0 vs 64.3 s).
Humansn = 2,917
Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study
European radiology13 Aug 2026

Cancer detection rate

upin humans1

1 study

Artificial intelligence assistance increases cancer detection rate in humans (22.3 vs 11.5 per 1000).
Humansn = 4,577
Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study
European radiology13 Aug 2026

Latest

1 in 12 months

European Radiology13 Aug

Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study

Cohort study of 4,577 peopleInterventions

Paper

Artificial intelligence assistance

Outcomes

Latest

Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study

Related