Dietary inflammation score
Dietary inflammation score has been studied in 2 papers since 2023: 2 observational studies in people; 1 in the past year. The newest paper, Jan 30, 2026: “Association of novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with the incidence of diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease among adults: results from a large US cohort with 12-year follow-up”.
2 papers study it3 findingsUpdated
See all 2 papers on dietary inflammation score
At a glance
The findings reach people, from one lab or study. 2 independent labs in 2 countries.
“women in the third quartile of DIS had a 52% higher risk of developing T2DM (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15).”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 2 independent labs in 2 countries
- Funders: Fondazione Umberto Veronesi and 2 more
- 1 of 3 findings with company ties
- Humans2
What did studies of dietary inflammation score find?
1Studies of dietary inflammation score measured one outcome, Δage.
Δage
upin humans1
1 study
Δage
upin humans1
Dietary inflammation score is linked with higher Δage in humans (β = 0.27; 95%CI 0.10, 0.44).
“an increase in E-DIITM and DIS scores led to an increase in Δage (β = 0.22; 95%CI 0.05, 0.38; β = 0.27; 95%CI 0.10, 0.44, respectively)”
Humansn = 4,510
Nutrients
What is dietary inflammation score linked with?
2Studies link dietary inflammation score with 2 measures: hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
Hypertension
upin humans1HR 1.22
1 study
Hypertension
upin humans1HR 1.22
Dietary inflammation score is linked with a higher risk of hypertension in humans (third quartile) (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47).
“individuals in the third quartile of DIS had a 22% higher risk of hypertension (1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47) in the overall population”
Humansthird quartile9.0 years median follow-up
BMJ open
Type 2 diabetes
upin humans1HR 1.52
1 study
Type 2 diabetes
upin humans1HR 1.52
Dietary inflammation score is linked with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes in women (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15).
“women in the third quartile of DIS had a 52% higher risk of developing T2DM (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15).”
Humansin women9.0 years median follow-upfemales
BMJ open