Computerized neuropsychological assessment
Computerized neuropsychological assessment has been studied in 1 paper since 2022: 1 observational study in people. The newest paper, Jan 1, 2022: “Reliability, Validity, and User-Experience of Remote Unsupervised Computerized Neuropsychological Assessments in Community-Living 55- to 75-Year-Olds”.
1 paper studies it2 findingsUpdated
“Global cognition composites showed excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.8 over 1-month follow-up).”
None of its findings points the other way.
- 1 lab in 1 country
- Funders: Cancer Council New South Wales and 2 more
- Humans1
What is Computerized neuropsychological assessment linked with?
2Studies link Computerized neuropsychological assessment with 2 measures, most often paper-and-pencil neuropsychological test performance (1 study) and test-retest reliability (1).
Paper-and-pencil neuropsychological test performance
upin humans1
1 study
Paper-and-pencil neuropsychological test performance
upin humans1
Computerized neuropsychological assessment is associated with paper-and-pencil neuropsychological test performance in humans (R = 0.87, p = 0.04).
“A strong relationship between a combination of CNA measures and paper-and-pencil battery was found (canonical correlation R = 0.87, p = 0.04).”
Humansn = 52
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
Test-retest reliability
upin humans1
1 study
Test-retest reliability
upin humans1
Computerized neuropsychological assessment is associated with test-retest reliability in humans (ICCs > 0.8).
“Global cognition composites showed excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.8 over 1-month follow-up).”
Humans1-month follow-upn = 52
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD