medRxiv · Oct 28, 2026
The Vocabulary Test of the California Cognitive Assessment Battery (CCAB)
By Woods DL, Blank M, Hall K et al.
Objective. We report the design and metric properties of the vocabulary test of the California Cognitive Assessment Battery (CCAB), which adaptively delivers 24 trials from a 600-word list ordered by difficulty, and describe the demographic variables associated with vocabulary test performance. Method. 2,181 English-speaking adults aged 18-89 completed 24 four-alternative synonym items administered as a 1-up/1-down staircase over 60 difficulty levels, with step sizes that started large (4 levels) and decreased after successive performance reversals. Two scores were compared: the QuickSIN estimate over all trials (the default) and the mean of the last four difficulty levels. Retests were available at 1 day in 100 participants and at 12 months in 307; reliability was assessed with Pearson and intraclass correlations. Twenty-one demographic correlates were screened in the 2,176 participants with questionnaire data, and a seven-term comprehensive regression model was compared with age-education-gender (AEG) adjustment, each with and without race indicators. A dichotomous Rasch model was fitted to the trial-level responses to calibrate the difficulty assignments of the stimulus set. Results. Median administration time was 227 s. QuickSIN and last-four scores agreed closely (r = 0.98) and retested at 0.83 and 0.82 at 1 day and 0.81 and 0.79 at 12 months. Education correlated r = 0.43 with the vocabulary score, weekly reading hours r = 0.39, age r = 0.29, highest household income r = 0.27, and parental education r = 0.26; English as a second language correlated r = -0.19; gender did not (r = 0.003). Vocabulary scores were 0.15 levels higher per year of age across the cross-sectional sample, with higher scores at older ages in every education stratum. The comprehensive model explained 32% of the variance (10-fold cross-validated R^2 = .31; AEG, 17% in the same participants) and attenuated but did not eliminate group differences: adjusted coefficients relative to non-Hispanic White participants were -0.27 SD for Hispanic, -0.38 for non-Hispanic Asian, -0.38 for non-Hispanic "other", and -0.76 for non-Hispanic Black participants, all significant. Word difficulties calibrated separately in each group agreed with the non-Hispanic White calibration at r = 0.96. Rasch calibration gave rho = 0.95 between assigned and estimated difficulty among the 316 well-sampled words, with a median displacement of 2 levels and a within-level spread of 2.9 levels; rescoring on the calibrated scale raised 12-month retest reliability to 0.84. Calibrated difficulty correlated rho = -0.85 with Brysbaert et al. (2019) word prevalence norms. Conclusions. The CCAB vocabulary test provides a reliable four-minute estimate of verbal ability that was higher at older ages in this cross-sectional sample. The assigned difficulty levels were broadly correct, but the spread of difficulty within a level limited the resolution of level-based scores to approximately 2-3 levels.