medRxiv · Mar 10, 2026

A Two-Stage Questionnaire and Actigraphy Screening for Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder in a Multicenter Cohort

By Massimi CA, Ricciardiello Mejia G, Metzger A et al.

ObjectiveIsolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder is a prodromal marker of synucleinopathies. However, most cases remain undiagnosed due to the insufficient predictive value of questionnaires and limited access to confirmatory video-polysomnography. We assessed a two-stage screening strategy combining a brief questionnaire on rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder symptoms and other prodromes with wrist actigraphy across multiple case-control cohorts. MethodsParticipants aged 40-80 without neurodegenerative disease were recruited from five cohorts; all cases were confirmed by video-polysomnography. The questionnaire was administered to 289 participants, and 236 underwent [≥]14 nights of home wrist actigraphy. The wearable-based algorithm was built on four movement features (mean motor activity, activity index, short or long immobile bouts, twitch activity). Models were trained with nested cross-validation using XGBoost. ResultsThe full retrospective cohort included 396 participants (99 cases, 297 controls; mean age 64 {+/-} 11; 55% male). The dream enactment question alone achieved an area under the curve of 0.85, which improved to 0.86 using the four-item questionnaire. Actigraphy alone achieved 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity. In the subgroup completing both assessments (75 cases, 54 controls), the two-stage protocol--questionnaire followed by actigraphy--yielded 68% sensitivity and 100% specificity using the dream-enactment question alone, and 73% sensitivity and 100% specificity using the four-item questionnaire. InterpretationA two-stage protocol combining questionnaire and actigraphy demonstrated high specificity and good sensitivity for detecting isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder in this multicenter cohort. This low-cost, scalable strategy is compatible with widely used wearable devices and warrants validation in community-based populations.

doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.09.26347106Open accessBiomarkers

AgingResearch.News