Occupational and Environmental Medicine · Oct 24, 2022

Ever and cumulative occupational exposure and lung function decline in longitudinal population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

By Rabbani G, Nimmi N, Benke GP et al.

OBJECTIVES: Adverse occupational exposures can accelerate age-related lung function decline. Some longitudinal population-based studies have investigated this association. This study aims to examine this association using findings reported by longitudinal population-based studies. METHODS: Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using keywords and text words related to occupational exposures and lung function and 12 longitudinal population-based studies were identified using predefined inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Lung function decline was defined as annual loss of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC) or the ratio (FEV₁/FVC). Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate pooled estimates for ever and cumulative exposures. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. RESULTS: Ever exposures to gases/fumes, vapours, gases, dusts, fumes (VGDF) and aromatic solvents were significantly associated with FEV₁ decline in meta-analyses. Cumulative exposures for these three occupational agents observed a similar trend of FEV₁ decline. Ever exposures to fungicides and cumulative exposures to biological dust, fungicides and insecticides were associated with FEV₁ decline in fixed-effect models only. No statistically significant association was observed between mineral dust, herbicides and metals and FEV₁ decline in meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Pooled estimates from the longitudinal population-based studies have provided evidence that occupational exposures are associated with FEV₁ decline. Specific exposure control and respiratory health surveillance are required to protect the lung health of the workers.

doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2022-108237Open accessPubMed 36280382Populations